People v. Suber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Suber

58 A.D.2d 664, 395 N.Y.S.2d 525, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12763

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 58 A.D.2d 664 (People v. Suber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Suber, 58 A.D.2d 664, 395 N.Y.S.2d 525, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12763 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Clinton County, rendered November 5, 1976, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree. The only issue raised on this appeal is defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh and excessive. His guilty plea was entered with knowledge of the sentence to be imposed and in full satisfaction of other charges pending against him. Moreover, he had previously been convicted of a drug-related offense. We are unable to say that, on this record, an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment with a maximum of nine years and a minimum of three years was excessive or represented an abuse of discretion (People v Caputo, 13 AD2d 861). Judgment affirmed. Koreman P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Mahoney, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Clinton County, rendered November 5, 1976, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree. The only issue raised on this appeal is defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh and excessive. His guilty plea was entered with knowledge of the sentence to be imposed and in full satisfaction of other charges pending against him. Moreover, he had previously been convicted of a drug-related offense. We are unable to say that, on this record, an indeterminate sentence of imprisonment with a maximum of nine years and a minimum of three years was excessive or represented an abuse of discretion (People v Caputo, 13 AD2d 861). Judgment affirmed. Koreman P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Mahoney, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.D.2d 664, 395 N.Y.S.2d 525, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-suber-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack