People v. Suarez

52 A.D.3d 423, 862 N.Y.S.2d 34
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 26, 2008·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), entered on or about May 31, 2006, adjudicating defendant a level two sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant, who was assessed 120 points, which is 10 points over the threshold for a level three adjudication, and who received a downward departure to level two, seeks a further downward departure to a level one adjudication. We perceive no basis for a farther departure (see People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]). The Board of Examiners’ recommendation for a downward departure to level two took into account mitigating factors relating to the underlying sex crime, and defendant [424] failed to show any other factors warranting a further departure. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Tom, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Suarez, 52 A.D.3d 423, 862 N.Y.S.2d 34 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

52 A.D.3d 423 (People v. Suarez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SCHWARTZ, DONALD, PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
People v. Schwartz
145 A.D.3d 1548 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)