People v. Suarez

119 A.D.2d 839, 501 N.Y.S.2d 466, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55794
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 28, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 119 A.D.2d 839 (People v. Suarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Suarez, 119 A.D.2d 839, 501 N.Y.S.2d 466, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lombardo, J.), rendered May 5, 1982, convicting him of rape in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, assault in the second degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Judgment modified, on the law, by reducing the defendant’s conviction of robbery in the second degree to one of robbery in [840]*840the third degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and vacating the defendant’s conviction of assault in the second degree and the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment. As so modified, judgment affirmed, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing on the conviction of robbery in the third degree.

The evidence was sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt of rape in the first degree. However, insofar as the robbery and assault counts are concerned, the evidence was legally insufficient to establish that the complainant suffered physical injury within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00 (9) (see, Matter of Pernell M., 98 AD2d 776, 776-777; People v Reed, 83 AD2d 566). Since the evidence was sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of robbery in the third degree, we have reduced the robbery in the second degree conviction to one for robbery in the third degree. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Franklin
149 A.D.2d 617 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
People v. Bogan
126 A.D.2d 734 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 A.D.2d 839, 501 N.Y.S.2d 466, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-suarez-nyappdiv-1986.