People v. Stuffle

175 N.Y.S.3d 915, 2022 NY Slip Op 06193
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 3, 2022
Docket112192
StatusPublished

This text of 175 N.Y.S.3d 915 (People v. Stuffle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Stuffle, 175 N.Y.S.3d 915, 2022 NY Slip Op 06193 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Stuffle (2022 NY Slip Op 06193)
People v Stuffle
2022 NY Slip Op 06193
Decided on November 3, 2022
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:November 3, 2022

112192

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Lonsdale Stuffle, Appellant.


Calendar Date:October 7, 2022
Before:Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Reynolds Fitzgerald and McShan, JJ.

Thomas J. Butler, Albany, for appellant.

J. Anthony Jordan, District Attorney, Fort Edward (Taylor R. Fitzsimmons of counsel), for respondent.



Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Washington County (Kelly S. McKeighan, J.), rendered October 4, 2019, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and waived his right to appeal. County Court sentenced defendant, pursuant to the terms of the plea agreement, to a prison term of two years followed by one year of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that may be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and counsel's brief, we agree. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Washburn, 76 AD3d 1120, 1121 [3d Dept 2010], lv denied 16 NY3d 864 [2011]; see generally People v Beaty, 22 NY3d 490 [2014]; People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]; People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [3d Dept 1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]).

Garry, P.J., Lynch, Clark, Reynolds Fitzgerald and McShan, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Stokes
744 N.E.2d 1153 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Gilford
948 N.E.2d 920 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Beaty
5 N.E.3d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
People v. Cruwys
113 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 N.Y.S.3d 915, 2022 NY Slip Op 06193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stuffle-nyappdiv-2022.