People v. Stuber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Stuber

15 A.D.3d 782, 789 N.Y.S.2d 773, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1918

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 24, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 15 A.D.3d 782 (People v. Stuber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Stuber, 15 A.D.3d 782, 789 N.Y.S.2d 773, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schoharie County (Bartlett, III, J.), rendered October 8, 2003, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Following defendant’s plea of guilty to attempted burglary in the second degree, he was sentenced to five years’ probation. Defendant thereafter admitted to violating the terms of his probation. Given defendant’s subsequent unsuccessful participation in a drug treatment program, he was sentenced to a prison term of 3V2 years followed by three years of postrelease supervision. On appeal, defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Cardona, EJ, Mercure, Spain, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. [783]*783Ordered, that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schoharie County (Bartlett, III, J.), rendered October 8, 2003, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Following defendant’s plea of guilty to attempted burglary in the second degree, he was sentenced to five years’ probation. Defendant thereafter admitted to violating the terms of his probation. Given defendant’s subsequent unsuccessful participation in a drug treatment program, he was sentenced to a prison term of 3V2 years followed by three years of postrelease supervision. On appeal, defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Cardona, EJ, Mercure, Spain, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. [783]*783Ordered, that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 A.D.3d 782, 789 N.Y.S.2d 773, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stuber-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack