People v. Stubbs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Stubbs

195 A.D.2d 530, 601 N.Y.S.2d 824

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 12, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 195 A.D.2d 530 (People v. Stubbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Stubbs, 195 A.D.2d 530, 601 N.Y.S.2d 824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Ingrassia, J.), rendered February 10, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. By decision and order dated July 8, 1991, the judgment was affirmed (see, People v Stubbs, 175 AD2d 187). By order dated October 14, 1992, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, complying with the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (see, Stubbs v Leonardo, 973 F2d 167), conditionally granting the defendant’s writ of habeas corpus, remitted the matter for this Court to grant the defendant leave to file a pro se supplemental brief and reconsider the merits of his appeal in light thereof. Justice Copertino has been substituted for former Justice Kunzeman (see, 22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

Ordered that, upon reargument, the original determination is adhered to.

We have considered the arguments raised in the defendant’s pro se supplemental brief and find them to be without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Ingrassia, J.), rendered February 10, 1981, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. By decision and order dated July 8, 1991, the judgment was affirmed (see, People v Stubbs, 175 AD2d 187). By order dated October 14, 1992, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, complying with the mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (see, Stubbs v Leonardo, 973 F2d 167), conditionally granting the defendant’s writ of habeas corpus, remitted the matter for this Court to grant the defendant leave to file a pro se supplemental brief and reconsider the merits of his appeal in light thereof. Justice Copertino has been substituted for former Justice Kunzeman (see, 22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

Ordered that, upon reargument, the original determination is adhered to.

We have considered the arguments raised in the defendant’s pro se supplemental brief and find them to be without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 A.D.2d 530, 601 N.Y.S.2d 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stubbs-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack