People v. Stuart

30 A.D.3d 1049, 815 N.Y.S.2d 849
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 9, 2006
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 30 A.D.3d 1049 (People v. Stuart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Stuart, 30 A.D.3d 1049, 815 N.Y.S.2d 849 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Livingston County Court (Ronald A. Cicoria, J„), rendered June 1, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the third degree (two counts), grand larceny in the fourth degree (two counts) and criminal trespass in the third degree (four counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of two counts each of grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law § 155.35) and grand larceny in the fourth degree (§ 155.30 [1]), and four counts of criminal trespass in the third degree (§ 140.10 [a]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the amount of restitution ordered (see People v Breen, 30 AD3d 1034 [2006]; People v McCorkle, 298 AD2d 848, 848-849 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 561 [2002]), and we decline to exercise our power to review that challenge as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]; Breen, 30 AD3d 1034). Defendant also failed to preserve for our review his contention that County Court erred in imposing a surcharge in addition to restitution (see People v Dunn, 254 AD2d 511, 512 [1998], lv denied 92 NY2d 1031 [1998], cert denied 527 US 1024 [1999]). In any event, that contention is without merit because defendant had not made restitution at the time of sentencing (see Penal Law § 60.35 [6];

[1050]*1050People v Wilcox, 234 AD2d 1007 [1996], lv denied 89 NY2d 989 [1997]; see also People v Cabrera, 243 AD2d 720, 721 [1997]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.E, Scudder, Martoche, Smith and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Quishana M.
50 A.D.3d 1513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 A.D.3d 1049, 815 N.Y.S.2d 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stuart-nyappdiv-2006.