People v. Stuart (Lance)
This text of People v. Stuart (Lance) (People v. Stuart (Lance)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Lance Stuart, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Joanne B. Watters, J.), rendered October 25, 2017, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of forcible touching, and imposing sentence.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Joanne B. Watters, J.), rendered October 25, 2017, affirmed.
Defendant's guilty plea constituted a forfeiture of his statutory speedy trial claims (see People v O'Brien, 56 NY2d 1009 [1982]), as well as his related claim that the court improvidently denied his request for an adjournment to research a legal issue related to the speedy trial motion. In any event, the claims are without merit.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concurI concurI concur
Decision Date: April 11, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
People v. Stuart (Lance), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stuart-lance-nyappterm-2019.