People v. Strzep

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Strzep

257 A.D. 1042, 13 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9002

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 28, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D. 1042 (People v. Strzep) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Strzep, 257 A.D. 1042, 13 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9002 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of conviction affirmed. Memorandum: The verdict of the jury that the defendant was guilty of robbery in the first degree while armed is amply supported by the evidence. When the defendant was arraigned on the information filed by the district attorney', charging that he previously had been convicted of a felony, he was advised by the court that he was entitled to a jury trial of the charge. The defendant thereupon admitted that he was the same person who had been previously convicted of a felonv. The sentence of the court [1043]*1043was, therefore, in accord with the provisions of the Penal Law. All concur, Sears, P. J., not voting. (The judgment convicts defendant of the crime of robbery, first degree.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of conviction affirmed. Memorandum: The verdict of the jury that the defendant was guilty of robbery in the first degree while armed is amply supported by the evidence. When the defendant was arraigned on the information filed by the district attorney', charging that he previously had been convicted of a felony, he was advised by the court that he was entitled to a jury trial of the charge. The defendant thereupon admitted that he was the same person who had been previously convicted of a felonv. The sentence of the court [1043]*1043was, therefore, in accord with the provisions of the Penal Law. All concur, Sears, P. J., not voting. (The judgment convicts defendant of the crime of robbery, first degree.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 1042, 13 N.Y.S.2d 850, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-strzep-nyappdiv-1939.