People v. Strongminton

2019 NY Slip Op 912
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 6, 2019
DocketInd. No. 14-01331
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 912 (People v. Strongminton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Strongminton, 2019 NY Slip Op 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Strongminton (2019 NY Slip Op 00912)
People v Strongminton
2019 NY Slip Op 00912
Decided on February 6, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 6, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
JEFFREY A. COHEN
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, JJ.

2015-12164
(Ind. No. 14-01331)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Jarrell Strongminton, also known as Jarrell Strong-Minton, also known as Jarrell Strong Minton, appellant.


Leonard J. Levenson, New York, NY, for appellant.

Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Brian R. Pouliot and William C. Milaccio of counsel; Sara M. Moriarty on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ann E. Minihan, J.), rendered October 20, 2015, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant's argument involving his plea of guilty is not barred by his valid waiver of his right to appeal. A contention that a plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent survives a valid waiver of the right to appeal (see generally People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 10; People v Bryant, 159 AD3d 715, 716).

The defendant's contention is, however, unpreserved for appellate review, since he failed to move to withdraw the plea before sentencing (see People v McClenic, 155 AD3d 1064). In any event, the plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 17).

RIVERA, J.P., ROMAN, COHEN and HINDS-RADIX, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Fiumefreddo
626 N.E.2d 646 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)
People v. McClenic
2017 NY Slip Op 8393 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Harris
459 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Seaberg
541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-strongminton-nyappdiv-2019.