People v. Strong

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Strong

13 N.Y.2d 760

DecidedJuly 10, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 13 N.Y.2d 760 (People v. Strong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Strong, 13 N.Y.2d 760 (N.Y. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed, counts 5 and 6 of the indictment dismissed for want of sufficient proof to support a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt and a new trial ordered on count 3, with the consent of the prosecution, because of the failure of the District Attorney to make available at the trial Grand Jury minutes which he knew, or should have known, contained statements of the complaining witness contradictory of her trial testimony. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fttld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Foster and Scileppi.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed, counts 5 and 6 of the indictment dismissed for want of sufficient proof to support a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt and a new trial ordered on count 3, with the consent of the prosecution, because of the failure of the District Attorney to make available at the trial Grand Jury minutes which he knew, or should have known, contained statements of the complaining witness contradictory of her trial testimony. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fttld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Foster and Scileppi.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 N.Y.2d 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-strong-ny-1963.