People v. Streicher

217 A.D.2d 947, 629 N.Y.S.2d 594, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8368
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 14, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The record establishes that defendant made a voluntary, knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to appeal (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909; People v Austin, 212 AD2d 1061). That waiver encompassed defendant’s contentions that evidence procured pursuant to the warrant should have been suppressed because the informant was not placed under oath and that defendant was entitled to a Franks hearing (see, Franks v Delaware, 438 US 154). In any event, those contentions are without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, McCarthy, J.—Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Pine, Callahan, Doerr and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Streicher, 217 A.D.2d 947, 629 N.Y.S.2d 594, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8368 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

217 A.D.2d 947 (People v. Streicher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Zimmerman
219 A.D.2d 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)