People v. Straker

2025 NY Slip Op 00298
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 21, 2025
DocketInd. No. 1685/11 Appeal No. 56 Case No. 2018-3763
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 00298 (People v. Straker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Straker, 2025 NY Slip Op 00298 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Straker (2025 NY Slip Op 00298)
People v Straker
2025 NY Slip Op 00298
Decided on January 21, 2025
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: January 21, 2025
Before: Moulton, J.P., Kapnick, Kennedy, Mendez, Pitt-Burke, JJ.

Ind. No. 1685/11 Appeal No. 56 Case No. 2018-3763

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Michael Straker, Defendant-Appellant.


Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (IvÁn Pantoja of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Kalani A. Browne of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Raymond L. Bruce, J.), entered on or about January 3, 2024, which, after a hearing, adjudicated defendant a risk level two offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), Correctional Law Art 6-C, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). There is no basis for a downward departure, given the seriousness of the underlying conduct, and the danger that a reoffense by defendant would cause a high degree of harm (see People v Roldan, 140 AD3d 411 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 904 [2016]). Although the court at defendant's initial SORA hearing held that defendant had established mitigating factors warranting a downward departure from a presumptive level three assessment, it does not follow that because defendant was assessed as a presumptive level two offender at the second SORA hearing, conducted after remittitur by this Court, a downward departure to level one was required.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: January 21, 2025



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Roldan
140 A.D.3d 411 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 00298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-straker-nyappdiv-2025.