People v. Strahl
Opinion
Defendant is charged with breaking and entering a store with intent to commit larceny therein. CL 1948, § 750.110, as amended by PA 1964, No 133. Following a jury trial the defendant was convicted of the offense charged.
On appeal defendant, an admitted illicit drug user, questions the propriety of the instructions given to the jury by the trial court. Defendant contends that at the time he broke into the drug store in question he was under the influence of certain narcotic drugs and was, therefore, incapable of forming the requisite intent to commit larceny.
[46] The record does not disclose any objections by the defense to snch instructions, but notwithstanding such lack of objections
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
166 N.W.2d 62 (People v. Strahl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.