People v. Strahl

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Strahl

166 N.W.2d 62, 15 Mich. App. 45, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 781

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 20, 1968

DocketDocket No. 4,188

StatusPublished

This text of 166 N.W.2d 62 (People v. Strahl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Strahl, 166 N.W.2d 62, 15 Mich. App. 45, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 781 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant is charged with breaking and entering a store with intent to commit larceny therein. CL 1948, § 750.110, as amended by PA 1964, No 133. Following a jury trial the defendant was convicted of the offense charged.

On appeal defendant, an admitted illicit drug user, questions the propriety of the instructions given to the jury by the trial court. Defendant contends that at the time he broke into the drug store in question he was under the influence of certain narcotic drugs and was, therefore, incapable of forming the requisite intent to commit larceny.

[46]*46The record does not disclose any objections by the defense to snch instructions, but notwithstanding such lack of objections

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant is charged with breaking and entering a store with intent to commit larceny therein. CL 1948, § 750.110, as amended by PA 1964, No 133. Following a jury trial the defendant was convicted of the offense charged.

On appeal defendant, an admitted illicit drug user, questions the propriety of the instructions given to the jury by the trial court. Defendant contends that at the time he broke into the drug store in question he was under the influence of certain narcotic drugs and was, therefore, incapable of forming the requisite intent to commit larceny.

[46]*46The record does not disclose any objections by the defense to snch instructions, but notwithstanding such lack of objections

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 N.W.2d 62, 15 Mich. App. 45, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-strahl-michctapp-1968.