People v. Storey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Storey

256 A.D.2d 426, 682 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13388

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D.2d 426 (People v. Storey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Storey, 256 A.D.2d 426, 682 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13388 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered February 27, 1996, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[427]*427Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the arresting officer’s testimony did not establish that he had previously been arrested for an unrelated crime (cf., People v Mullin, 41 NY2d 475; People v Harris, 52 AD2d 560; People v McCain, 42 AD2d 866).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered February 27, 1996, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[427]*427Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the arresting officer’s testimony did not establish that he had previously been arrested for an unrelated crime (cf., People v Mullin, 41 NY2d 475; People v Harris, 52 AD2d 560; People v McCain, 42 AD2d 866).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Miller, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D.2d 426, 682 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-storey-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack