People v. Stores

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Stores

300 A.D.2d 554, 752 N.Y.S.2d 549, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12740

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 2002·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the de[555] fendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marras, J.), dated May 24, 2002, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s determination designating him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Wroten, 286 AD2d 189). Smith, J.P., O’Brien, Krausman and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the de[555] fendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marras, J.), dated May 24, 2002, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s determination designating him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Wroten, 286 AD2d 189). Smith, J.P., O’Brien, Krausman and Rivera, JJ., concur.

People v. Stores, 300 A.D.2d 554, 752 N.Y.S.2d 549, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12740 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

300 A.D.2d 554 (People v. Stores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related