People v. Stone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Stone

222 A.D.2d 464, 635 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12546

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 222 A.D.2d 464 (People v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Stone, 222 A.D.2d 464, 635 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12546 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), rendered October 29, 1992, convicting him of murder in the second degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree (two counts), criminal mischief in the second degree, criminal mischief in the third degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (three counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Santucci, J. P., Altman, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), rendered October 29, 1992, convicting him of murder in the second degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree (two counts), criminal mischief in the second degree, criminal mischief in the third degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (three counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Santucci, J. P., Altman, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 A.D.2d 464, 635 N.Y.S.2d 523, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stone-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack