People v. Stokes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Stokes

109 A.D.3d 1016, 971 N.Y.S.2d 480

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 25, 2013·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Appeal by the de[1017] fendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J.), imposed October 24, 2011, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Stanley, 99 AD3d 955 [2012]). Eng, EJ., Rivera, Leventhal and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the de[1017] fendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J.), imposed October 24, 2011, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Stanley, 99 AD3d 955 [2012]). Eng, EJ., Rivera, Leventhal and Hall, JJ., concur.

People v. Stokes, 109 A.D.3d 1016, 971 N.Y.S.2d 480 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

109 A.D.3d 1016 (People v. Stokes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related