People v. Stokes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Stokes

5 A.D.3d 651, 774 N.Y.S.2d 732, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3411

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 22, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chambers, J.), dated November 29, 2001, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s determination designating him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and therefore, should be not disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Cureton, 299 AD2d 532 [2002]; People v Bottisti, 285 AD2d 841 [2001]). Santucci, J.P., Florio, Krausman and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chambers, J.), dated November 29, 2001, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s determination designating him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and therefore, should be not disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Cureton, 299 AD2d 532 [2002]; People v Bottisti, 285 AD2d 841 [2001]). Santucci, J.P., Florio, Krausman and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

People v. Stokes, 5 A.D.3d 651, 774 N.Y.S.2d 732, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

5 A.D.3d 651 (People v. Stokes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related