People v. Stokes

36 P. 834, 102 Cal. 501, 1894 Cal. LEXIS 674
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedMay 25, 1894
DocketNo. 21070
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 36 P. 834 (People v. Stokes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Stokes, 36 P. 834, 102 Cal. 501, 1894 Cal. LEXIS 674 (Cal. 1894).

Opinion

The Court.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Tulare county, California, dismissing an information which was pending in said court against the defendant. On June 15, 1893, upon motion of the district attorney, the superior court ordered, that the case “be and is hereby dismissed, on the grounds that the offense charged was committed in the territory comprising the new county of Kings.” The defendant contends that this dismissal is erroneous, because it was not made for a statutory reason, nor in furtherance of justice. For the purpose of this case it is sufficient to say that a defendant is not entitled to an appeal from an order dismissing a prosecution which is pending [502]*502against him. If courts deem it proper to dismiss prosecutions against defendants charged with crime, we know of no objections in law which a defendant is entitled to urge against such a course. This defendant was not injured by the order of the court dismissing the prosecution which resulted in his discharge.

For the foregoing reasons the order is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Cleveland
37 Cal. App. 3d 547 (California Court of Appeal, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 P. 834, 102 Cal. 501, 1894 Cal. LEXIS 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stokes-cal-1894.