People v. Stogner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Stogner

255 A.D.2d 533, 680 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12605

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 23, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D.2d 533 (People v. Stogner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Stogner, 255 A.D.2d 533, 680 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12605 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered July 22, 1996, convicting her of grand larceny in the third degree under Indictment No. 95-00025, and a purported appeal from a judgment of the saíne court, also dated July 22, 1996, convicting her of bail jumping in the second degree under Indictment No. 96-00113, upon her pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the purported appeal from.the judgment convicting her under Indictment No. 96-00113 is dismissed, as no notice of appeal from that conviction was filed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment convicting her under Indictment No. 95-00025 is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal regarding the conviction under Indictment No. 95-00025. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered July 22, 1996, convicting her of grand larceny in the third degree under Indictment No. 95-00025, and a purported appeal from a judgment of the saíne court, also dated July 22, 1996, convicting her of bail jumping in the second degree under Indictment No. 96-00113, upon her pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the purported appeal from.the judgment convicting her under Indictment No. 96-00113 is dismissed, as no notice of appeal from that conviction was filed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment convicting her under Indictment No. 95-00025 is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal regarding the conviction under Indictment No. 95-00025. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D.2d 533, 680 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stogner-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack