People v. Stoddart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Stoddart

4 A.D.2d 837, 167 N.Y.S.2d 237, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4476

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 26, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 4 A.D.2d 837 (People v. Stoddart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Stoddart, 4 A.D.2d 837, 167 N.Y.S.2d 237, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4476 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgement of the County Court, Westchester County, convicting appellant of grand larceny in the first degree, on his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to a term of imprisonment in a State prison for an indeterminate term, the maximum of such imprisonment to be two years and the minimum one year. Judgment modified on the facts by directing that appellant be confined in the local penitentiary, hy reducing his sentence to the time already served and by giving him full credit for such time. As so modified, judgment unanimously affirmed. In our opinion, since appellant is a first offender, the interests of justice will be better served by thus modifying the judgment. Present — Beldock, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgement of the County Court, Westchester County, convicting appellant of grand larceny in the first degree, on his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to a term of imprisonment in a State prison for an indeterminate term, the maximum of such imprisonment to be two years and the minimum one year. Judgment modified on the facts by directing that appellant be confined in the local penitentiary, hy reducing his sentence to the time already served and by giving him full credit for such time. As so modified, judgment unanimously affirmed. In our opinion, since appellant is a first offender, the interests of justice will be better served by thus modifying the judgment. Present — Beldock, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.D.2d 837, 167 N.Y.S.2d 237, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stoddart-nyappdiv-1957.