People v. Stiles

143 A.D.3d 747, 38 N.Y.S.3d 436
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 5, 2016·No. 2014-03409·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

People v Stiles (2016 NY Slip Op 06516)
People v Stiles
2016 NY Slip Op 06516
Decided on October 5, 2016
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 5, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
RANDALL T. ENG, P.J.
MARK C. DILLON
SANDRA L. SGROI
ROBERT J. MILLER
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

2014-03409
(Ind. No. 5364/11)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Tavajah Stiles, appellant.


Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, NY (Paul Skip Laisure of counsel; Lauren Margolies on the memorandum), for appellant.

Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cyrulnik, J.), imposed March 5, 2014, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record of the plea proceeding demonstrates that he received an explanation of the nature of the right to appeal and the consequences of waiving that right (see People v Romero-Flores, 128 AD3d 1102, 1102; People v McRae, 123 AD3d 848, 848-849; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 144). On the record presented, we conclude that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see generally People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735). Accordingly, the defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Hardy, 120 AD3d 1358, 1358; People v Arteev, 120 AD3d 1255, 1255; People v Alexander, 104 AD3d 862, 862).

ENG, P.J., DILLON, SGROI, MILLER and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Stiles, 143 A.D.3d 747, 38 N.Y.S.3d 436 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

143 A.D.3d 747 (People v. Stiles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Davis
2019 NY Slip Op 5681 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Stephensbush
2019 NY Slip Op 3821 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Ayala
2019 NY Slip Op 3799 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Li
2019 NY Slip Op 1098 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Carryl
2019 NY Slip Op 1088 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Miller
2018 NY Slip Op 7757 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Swen
2018 NY Slip Op 5949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Leak
2018 NY Slip Op 5695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Spitzer
2018 NY Slip Op 5062 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Rocchino
2017 NY Slip Op 6462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Blackwood
2017 NY Slip Op 1560 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)