People v. Stigler

174 N.E.2d 324, 9 N.Y.2d 717
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 2, 1961
StatusPublished

This text of 174 N.E.2d 324 (People v. Stigler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Stigler, 174 N.E.2d 324, 9 N.Y.2d 717 (N.Y. 1961).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed. The court’s charge was erroneous insofar as it instructed the jury that the confession could be rejected as involuntary only if found to have been obtained by threats or force or fear induced by the persons who actually received the confession, but, where, as here, defendant has denied making any confession or admission, the instruction was irrelevant and could not have been prejudicial. No claim was made by defendant at the trial that he was induced to confess by reason of any such threats or fears. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge- Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster. Judge Froessel concurs in result under section 542 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 N.E.2d 324, 9 N.Y.2d 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stigler-ny-1961.