People v. Stigler
This text of 174 N.E.2d 324 (People v. Stigler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed. The court’s charge was erroneous insofar as it instructed the jury that the confession could be rejected as involuntary only if found to have been obtained by threats or force or fear induced by the persons who actually received the confession, but, where, as here, defendant has denied making any confession or admission, the instruction was irrelevant and could not have been prejudicial. No claim was made by defendant at the trial that he was induced to confess by reason of any such threats or fears. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge- Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster. Judge Froessel concurs in result under section 542 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 N.E.2d 324, 9 N.Y.2d 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stigler-ny-1961.