People v. Stickney

14 N.W. 880, 50 Mich. 99, 1883 Mich. LEXIS 732
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 19, 1883·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Information for embezzlement. The respondent pleaded guilty. The judge receiving the plea examined the respondent to ascertain whether the plea was voluntary, but the examination was in the presence of the officers of the court and other persons. Sentence having been passed—

Blanchard & Cagwin for respondent, to the point that this examination was not sufficient, referred to Public Acts of 1875 p. 140; Edwards v. People 39 Mich. 760; Clark v. People 44 Mich. 308.

Attorney-General Jacob J. Van Riper concurred in this view, and

The Court ordered the judgment reversed and the respondent discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Stickney, 14 N.W. 880, 50 Mich. 99, 1883 Mich. LEXIS 732 (Mich. 1883).

14 N.W. 880 (People v. Stickney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Harris
253 N.W. 312 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1934)
People v. Williams
195 N.W. 818 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1923)
People v. Brown
19 N.W. 571 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1884)
People v. Lewis
16 N.W. 326 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1883)