People v. Stickney
This text of 14 N.W. 880 (People v. Stickney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Information for embezzlement. The respondent pleaded guilty. The judge receiving the plea examined the respondent to ascertain whether the plea was voluntary, but the examination was in the presence of the officers of the court and other persons. Sentence having been passed—
Blanchard & Cagwin for respondent, to the point that this examination was not sufficient, referred to Public Acts of 1875 p. 140; Edwards v. People 39 Mich. 760; Clark v. People 44 Mich. 308.
Attorney-General Jacob J. Van Riper concurred in this view, and
The Court ordered the judgment reversed and the respondent discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 N.W. 880, 50 Mich. 99, 1883 Mich. LEXIS 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stickney-mich-1883.