People v. Sticatto

278 A.D.2d 345, 718 N.Y.S.2d 197, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12876
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 11, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 278 A.D.2d 345 (People v. Sticatto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Sticatto, 278 A.D.2d 345, 718 N.Y.S.2d 197, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lipp, J.), rendered September 19, 1996, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his [346]*346challenges to the prosecutor’s summation because he either failed to object, to seek curative instructions, or to move for a mistrial (see, People v Rivera, 73 NY2d 941; People v Balls, 69 NY2d 641). In any event, the prosecutor’s comments made during summation did not exceed the broad bounds of rhetorical comment permissible in closing argument (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396).

There was no violation of CPL 310.10 (see, People v Fernandez, 81 NY2d 1023).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Santucci, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and Kfausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Davis
287 A.D.2d 516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D.2d 345, 718 N.Y.S.2d 197, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-sticatto-nyappdiv-2000.