People v. Stewart

136 A.D.3d 624, 23 N.Y.S.3d 903
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 3, 2016·No. 2011-04032·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walsh, J.), imposed April 8, 2011, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

As the People correctly concede, the defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Dillon, Sgroi, Hinds-Radix and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Stewart, 136 A.D.3d 624, 23 N.Y.S.3d 903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

136 A.D.3d 624 (People v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rodriguez
2018 NY Slip Op 2491 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)