People v. Stewart
57 A.D.3d 581, 867 N.Y.2d 697
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 2, 2008·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
The record does not establish that the defendant was informed, prior to entering his plea, that his sentence would necessarily include a period of postrelease supervision. As the [582]*582People concede, the plea must therefore be vacated (see People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541 [2007]; People v Bernard, 53 AD3d 586 [2008]; People v Cook, 49 AD3d 777 [2008]; People v Thompson, 47 AD3d 648 [2008]). Skelos, J.P., Dillon, Carni and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Stewart, 57 A.D.3d 581, 867 N.Y.2d 697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
57 A.D.3d 581 (People v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Edmondson
2021 NY Slip Op 08201 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Lindsay
72 A.D.3d 845 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Gibbs
61 A.D.3d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Borrego
59 A.D.3d 456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)