Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Stewart

People v. Stewart

228 A.D.2d 707, 644 N.Y.2d 971, 644 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7414
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 24, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 228 A.D.2d 707 (People v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Stewart, 228 A.D.2d 707, 644 N.Y.2d 971, 644 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7414 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

[708]*708We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 707, 644 N.Y.2d 971, 644 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stewart-nyappdiv-1996.