People v. Stevenson

71 A.D.3d 796, 895 N.Y.S.2d 750
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 9, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 71 A.D.3d 796 (People v. Stevenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Stevenson, 71 A.D.3d 796, 895 N.Y.S.2d 750 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

[797]*797Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.), rendered April 3, 2008, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and vacating the sentence imposed thereon; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant was indicted for, inter alia, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree pursuant to Penal Law § 265.03 (3). The trial court, however, submitted to the jury the charge of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree pursuant to Penal Law § 265.03 (1) (b). The defendant raised no objection to the charge.

The crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, as charged to the jury, did not exist in the Penal Law at the time the defendant committed the subject crime on December 13, 2006 (see L 2006, chs 742, 745). Since the crime did not exist, “there could not be evidence to support conviction beyond a reasonable doubt, and the conviction must be reversed” (People v Martinez, 81 NY2d 810, 812 [1993]). Additionally, “such a conviction presents error fundamental to ‘the organization of the court or the mode of proceedings proscribed by law’ that cannot be waived” (People v Martinez, 81 NY2d at 812, quoting People v Patterson, 39 NY2d 288, 295 [1976], affd 432 US 197 [1977]). Accordingly, as the defendant correctly contends, he did not need to preserve this issue for appellate review.

The sentence imposed on the defendant’s conviction of manslaughter in the first degree was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 83 [1982]). Mastro, J.P., Dickerson, Belen and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Dibble
2019 NY Slip Op 7165 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
In re Mercedes K.
89 A.D.3d 944 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 A.D.3d 796, 895 N.Y.S.2d 750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stevenson-nyappdiv-2010.