People v. Stevenson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Stevenson

139 A.D.2d 540, 526 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3758

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 4, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 139 A.D.2d 540 (People v. Stevenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Stevenson, 139 A.D.2d 540, 526 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3758 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), all rendered January 11, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (3 counts, 1 as to each indictment), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to raise his objection to the adequacy of his plea allocution in the court of first instance and, accordingly, has not preserved his claim for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). A reversal in the interest of justice is not warranted under the circumstances (see, People v Kruger, 132 AD2d 624, 625; People v Burnett, 105 AD2d 710; People v Ebron, 87 AD2d 653).

Finally, the defendant’s sentence was not excessive under the circumstances. Mangano, J. P., Kunzeman, Rubin, Hooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), all rendered January 11, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (3 counts, 1 as to each indictment), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to raise his objection to the adequacy of his plea allocution in the court of first instance and, accordingly, has not preserved his claim for appellate review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). A reversal in the interest of justice is not warranted under the circumstances (see, People v Kruger, 132 AD2d 624, 625; People v Burnett, 105 AD2d 710; People v Ebron, 87 AD2d 653).

Finally, the defendant’s sentence was not excessive under the circumstances. Mangano, J. P., Kunzeman, Rubin, Hooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 A.D.2d 540, 526 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stevenson-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack