People v. Stevens

134 A.D.3d 1057, 20 N.Y.S.3d 906
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Stevens. Read the opinion of the Court — 127 A.D.3d 791
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 23, 2015·No. 2014-04797·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Del Giudice, J.), imposed April 30, 2014, upon his convictions of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and unlawful imprisonment, upon a jury verdict, after remittitur from this Court for resentencing (see People v Stevens, 114 AD3d 969 [2014]).

Ordered that the resentence is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the determinate term of imprisonment from 22 years to 17 years; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was penalized for exercising his right to trial is without merit (see People v Melendez, 71 AD3d 1166, 1167 [2010]). The defendant’s contention that the *1058 resentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment is unpreserved for appellate review and is, in any event, without merit (see People v Gil, 109 AD3d 484, 485 [2013]; People v Khan, 89 AD3d 750, 751-752 [2011]). However, the resentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Balkin, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Stevens, 134 A.D.3d 1057, 20 N.Y.S.3d 906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

134 A.D.3d 1057 (People v. Stevens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Melendez
71 A.D.3d 1166 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Khan
89 A.D.3d 750 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Gil
109 A.D.3d 484 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Stevens
114 A.D.3d 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)