People v. Stevens
89 A.D.3d 577, 932 N.Y.2d 692
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Stevens. Read the opinion of the Court — 57 A.D.3d 1515 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 17, 2011·Published
Opinion
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations, including its resolution of alleged conflicts in testimony. The evidence established the requisite intent to defraud (see e.g. People v Rodriguez, 71 AD3d 450 [2010], affd 17 NY3d 486 [2011]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta and AbdusSalaam, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Stevens, 89 A.D.3d 577, 932 N.Y.2d 692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).
89 A.D.3d 577 (People v. Stevens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
People v. Rodriguez
957 N.E.2d 1133 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)