People v. Stevens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Stevens

307 A.D.2d 1050, 763 N.Y.S.2d 757, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9022

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 25, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 307 A.D.2d 1050 (People v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Stevens, 307 A.D.2d 1050, 763 N.Y.S.2d 757, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9022 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered January 30, 2001, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Friedman, J.), upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to [1051]*1051withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Friedmann, Adams and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered January 30, 2001, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Friedman, J.), upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to [1051]*1051withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Friedmann, Adams and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

307 A.D.2d 1050, 763 N.Y.S.2d 757, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stevens-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack