People v. Stevens

150 A.D.2d 404, 543 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5670
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Stevens. Read the opinion of the Court — 151 A.D.2d 704

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D’Amaro, J.), rendered September 26, 1985, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at the trial in a light most favorable to the People (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the conviction. [405]*405Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are moreover satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). Further, the sentence imposed by the court was appropriate. Bracken, J. P., Kooper, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Stevens, 150 A.D.2d 404, 543 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5670 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

150 A.D.2d 404 (People v. Stevens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)