People v. Steven M.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Steven M.

108 A.D.2d 874, 485 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43204

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 19, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 108 A.D.2d 874 (People v. Steven M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Steven M., 108 A.D.2d 874, 485 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43204 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Edelstein, J.), rendered January 15,1982, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to a term of imprisonment of 60 days to run concurrent with a five-year term of probation, and denying him youthful offender status.

Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating defendant’s conviction and adjudicating him a youthful offender. As so modified, judgment affirmed, and case remitted to the County Court, Rockland County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

[875]*875Under all of the circumstances, defendant should have been afforded youthful offender status. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Edelstein, J.), rendered January 15,1982, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to a term of imprisonment of 60 days to run concurrent with a five-year term of probation, and denying him youthful offender status.

Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating defendant’s conviction and adjudicating him a youthful offender. As so modified, judgment affirmed, and case remitted to the County Court, Rockland County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

[875]*875Under all of the circumstances, defendant should have been afforded youthful offender status. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Mangano and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 A.D.2d 874, 485 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-steven-m-nyappdiv-1985.