People v. Steven B.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Steven B.

121 A.D.2d 643, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58629

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 121 A.D.2d 643 (People v. Steven B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Steven B., 121 A.D.2d 643, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58629 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.), imposed September 16, 1985, upon his adjudication as a youthful offender on his plea of guilty to criminal mischief in the second degree, the sentence being five years’ probation with a term of six months’ imprisonment running concurrently with the term of probation as a condition thereof, and restitution in the sum of $2,500.

Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating the condition of probation requiring the defendant to serve a term of six months’ imprisonment. As so modified, sentence affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, the sentence was excessive to the extent indicated.

Cross motion by the People to dismiss the defendant’s appeal from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County, imposed September 16, 1985, denied (see, People v Pollenz, 67 NY2d 264). Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Weinstein and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.), imposed September 16, 1985, upon his adjudication as a youthful offender on his plea of guilty to criminal mischief in the second degree, the sentence being five years’ probation with a term of six months’ imprisonment running concurrently with the term of probation as a condition thereof, and restitution in the sum of $2,500.

Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by vacating the condition of probation requiring the defendant to serve a term of six months’ imprisonment. As so modified, sentence affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, the sentence was excessive to the extent indicated.

Cross motion by the People to dismiss the defendant’s appeal from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County, imposed September 16, 1985, denied (see, People v Pollenz, 67 NY2d 264). Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Weinstein and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 A.D.2d 643, 503 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 58629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-steven-b-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack