People v. Stephens

291 A.D.2d 841, 737 N.Y.S.2d 889, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 944
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 1, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 291 A.D.2d 841 (People v. Stephens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Stephens, 291 A.D.2d 841, 737 N.Y.S.2d 889, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 944 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County (Tills, J.), entered February 4, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of attempted robbery in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the case is held, the decision is reserved and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant entered a plea of guilty to attempted robbery in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 160.15 [4]) for the armed robbery of a cab driver. Prior to sentencing, defendant sent a letter to Supreme Court, requesting that he be permitted to withdraw his plea because he had a conflict with his attorney and because his attorney had misrepresented the maximum sentence he could receive if he were convicted after trial of robbery in the first degree. Defense counsel denied having made misrepresentations to defendant. The court told defendant that it chose to believe “your attorney over you in this case” and denied defendant’s motion. As the People correctly concede, the court erred in determining the motion “without first assigning a different attorney to represent defendant” (People v Chrysler, 233 AD2d 928). “A defendant is denied ef[842]*842fective assistance of counsel when his attorney, ‘either voluntarily or at the court’s urging, became a witness against him’ ” (People v Chrysler, supra at 928, quoting People v Santana, 156 AD2d 736, 737; see also, People v Pittman, 270 AD2d 883, 884). We thus hold the case, reserve decision and remit the matter to Supreme Court for the assignment of new counsel and a de novo determination of the motion to withdraw the guilty plea. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

GILMER, TEDDERICK A., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
People v. Gilmer
121 A.D.3d 1517 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Stephens
6 A.D.3d 1123 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Lewis
305 A.D.2d 993 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. Chaney
294 A.D.2d 931 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
291 A.D.2d 841, 737 N.Y.S.2d 889, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stephens-nyappdiv-2002.