People v. Stephen
This text of 237 A.D.2d 897 (People v. Stephen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that County Court erroneously vacated his original plea of guilty. Defendant has failed to provide transcripts of the October 4, 1994 plea hearing and the later proceeding on November 15, 1994 at which the court allegedly vacated the plea. Thus, appellate review of that contention is precluded (see, People v Cotton, 237 AD2d 943 [decided herewith]; People v Tucker, 102 AD2d 535, 539). There is no merit to the contention that the sentence following a plea entered July 13, 1995 is unduly harsh or severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Niagara County Court, Fricano, J.—Attempted Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present—Den-man, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Doerr and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
237 A.D.2d 897, 656 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stephen-nyappdiv-1997.