People v. Stenson
This text of 275 A.D.2d 982 (People v. Stenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention that Supreme Court erred in permitting the prosecutor to cross-examine defendant with respect to a conviction of criminal mischief in the fourth degree in 1992 and an unspecified mis[983]*983demeanor in 1994. Those convictions bear directly on the credibility of defendant and reveal his willingness to place his interests above those of society (see, People v Quesnel, 238 AD2d 725, 727, lv denied 90 NY2d 896; People v Boyd, 150 AD2d 786, 787). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Ark, J. — Sexual Abuse, 1st Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Wisner, Kehoe and Balio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 A.D.2d 982, 715 N.Y.S.2d 195, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9648, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stenson-nyappdiv-2000.