People v. Stemmer, Krakower

83 N.E.2d 141, 298 N.Y. 728
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 24, 1948·Published·Cited by 19 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed. Upon this appeal the following question was presented and necessarily passed upon: The appellants contended that the receipt in evidence of wire tapped telephone calls was illegal because of section 605 of the Federal Communications Act of 1934 (U. S. Code, tit. 47, § 605). This court held to the contrary. (See Matter of Harlem Check Cashing Corp. v. Bell, 296 N. Y. 15.) No opinion.

Concur: LougheaN, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, DesmoNd, Dye and Fuld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Stemmer, Krakower, 83 N.E.2d 141, 298 N.Y. 728 (N.Y. 1948).

83 N.E.2d 141 (People v. Stemmer, Krakower) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGuire v. State
92 A.2d 582 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
People v. Shapiro
409 N.E.2d 897 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Naples
26 Misc. 2d 1050 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
People v. Maranian
102 N.W.2d 568 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1960)
Griffith v. State
111 So. 2d 282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
People v. Grant
14 Misc. 2d 182 (New York Court of General Session of the Peace, 1958)
People v. Dinan
15 Misc. 2d 211 (New York County Courts, 1958)
United States v. Charles v. Gris
247 F.2d 860 (Second Circuit, 1957)
United States v. Salvatore Benanti
244 F.2d 389 (Second Circuit, 1957)
People v. Saperstein
140 N.E.2d 252 (New York Court of Appeals, 1957)
Commonwealth v. Chaitt
112 A.2d 379 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1955)
In re the Interception of Telephone Communications of Anonymous
207 Misc. 69 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)
Commonwealth v. Chaitt
107 A.2d 214 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1954)
People v. Feld
113 N.E.2d 440 (New York Court of Appeals, 1953)
Schwartz v. Texas
344 U.S. 199 (Supreme Court, 1952)
Commonwealth v. Charpentier
78 Pa. D. & C. 389 (Allegheny County Court of Oyer and Terminer, 1951)