People v. Steiner
This text of 713 N.W.2d 774 (People v. Steiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
David STEINER, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals as on leave granted for consideration of defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
713 N.W.2d 774, 475 Mich. 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-steiner-mich-2006.