People v. Stein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Stein

119 A.D.2d 605, 500 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55538

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 7, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 119 A.D.2d 605 (People v. Stein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Stein, 119 A.D.2d 605, 500 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55538 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Namm, J.), rendered July 5, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, assault in the second degree and unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

' Judgment affirmed.

The evidence was sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Additionally, the merger doctrine with respect to the charge of unlawful imprisonment in the first degree is inapplicable here since the crimes of assault and robbery were committed prior to the asportation of the [606]*606victim. Such abduction was therefore not "only the incidental means employed to facilitate the commission of the [robbery and assault]” (People v Cassidy, 40 NY2d 763, 768). Mollen, P. J., Rubin, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Namm, J.), rendered July 5, 1984, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, assault in the second degree and unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

' Judgment affirmed.

The evidence was sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Additionally, the merger doctrine with respect to the charge of unlawful imprisonment in the first degree is inapplicable here since the crimes of assault and robbery were committed prior to the asportation of the [606]*606victim. Such abduction was therefore not "only the incidental means employed to facilitate the commission of the [robbery and assault]” (People v Cassidy, 40 NY2d 763, 768). Mollen, P. J., Rubin, Eiber and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 A.D.2d 605, 500 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stein-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack