People v. Steele

136 A.D.3d 483, 24 N.Y.S.3d 509
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 9, 2016·No. 187 161/95·Published

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J.), entered on or about September 11, 2014, which adjudicated defendant a level three *484 sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument or outweighed by aggravating factors. Among other things, the very serious underlying offense, and defendant’s prior record, demonstrate a propensity to commit crimes against children.

To the extent that, in the context of requesting a departure, defendant challenges certain point assessments, we find those claims to be unavailing. In any event, defendant qualifies as a level three offender based on undisputed points.

Concur— Friedman, J.R, Acosta, Andrias, Saxe and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Steele, 136 A.D.3d 483, 24 N.Y.S.3d 509 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

136 A.D.3d 483 (People v. Steele) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)