People v. Stedtler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Stedtler

205 A.D.2d 829, 615 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5835

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 205 A.D.2d 829 (People v. Stedtler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Stedtler, 205 A.D.2d 829, 615 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Otsego County (Nydam, J.), [830]*830rendered September 13, 1993, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of sodomy in the second degree.

Upon entering his plea of guilty to sodomy in the second degree, defendant was sentenced to a prison term of 1 to 3 years. Defendant now argues that the sentence is harsh and excessive. The sentence imposed, however, was not only authorized by law, but was within the range that was promised at the time defendant entered his plea. In finding no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court, we also take note of the nature of the offense and the age of the victim involved.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Otsego County (Nydam, J.), [830]*830rendered September 13, 1993, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of sodomy in the second degree.

Upon entering his plea of guilty to sodomy in the second degree, defendant was sentenced to a prison term of 1 to 3 years. Defendant now argues that the sentence is harsh and excessive. The sentence imposed, however, was not only authorized by law, but was within the range that was promised at the time defendant entered his plea. In finding no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court, we also take note of the nature of the offense and the age of the victim involved.

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 829, 615 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stedtler-nyappdiv-1994.