People v. Stauss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Stauss

221 A.D.2d 387, 633 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11215

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 6, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered June 8, 1994, convicting her of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant explicitly admitted the amount of the victims’ monetary loss. Under these circumstances, there was no need for the court to conduct a hearing with respect to the proper amount of restitution (see, People v Kade, 153 AD2d 907).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) or without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Friedmann and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered June 8, 1994, convicting her of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant explicitly admitted the amount of the victims’ monetary loss. Under these circumstances, there was no need for the court to conduct a hearing with respect to the proper amount of restitution (see, People v Kade, 153 AD2d 907).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) or without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Friedmann and Gold-stein, JJ., concur.

People v. Stauss, 221 A.D.2d 387, 633 N.Y.S.2d 204, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11215 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

221 A.D.2d 387 (People v. Stauss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related