People v. Stauffer

247 A.D.2d 911, 668 N.Y.S.2d 532, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1253
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 4, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 247 A.D.2d 911 (People v. Stauffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Stauffer, 247 A.D.2d 911, 668 N.Y.S.2d 532, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1253 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum : The contention of defendant that County Court abused its discretion in sentencing him as a persistent felony offender is without merit (see, Penal Law § 70.10; People v Bowers, 201 AD2d 830, 831, lv denied 83 NY2d 909). Further, in light of defendant’s extensive history of alcohol related offenses and flagrant disregard for the consequences of driving in an intoxicated condition, we conclude that the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe (see, People v Turner, 234 AD2d 704, 707). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Felony Driving While Intoxicated.)

Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Mercado
294 A.D.2d 805 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D.2d 911, 668 N.Y.S.2d 532, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stauffer-nyappdiv-1998.