People v. Staton

124 A.D.2d 687, 507 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61990
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 10, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 124 A.D.2d 687 (People v. Staton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Staton, 124 A.D.2d 687, 507 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61990 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

At trial, the defendant did not specify why the charge as to alibi as given was inadequate; therefore the claimed error was not preserved for our review as a matter of law (see, People v Hoke, 62 NY2d 1022, 1023). In any event, a review of the alibi charge convinces us that it did, indeed, unequivocally convey the People’s burden to disprove an alibi beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Victor, 62 NY2d 374). The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621; People v Arce, 42 NY2d 179, 187). Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Niehoff and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Handel
133 A.D.3d 879 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Pilgrim
100 A.D.3d 932 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Hollingsworth
299 A.D.2d 368 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 A.D.2d 687, 507 N.Y.S.2d 919, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 61990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-staton-nyappdiv-1986.