People v. Statler

Erie County Court

People v. Statler

31 Misc. 2d 976, 222 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1855

DecidedDecember 22, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 31 Misc. 2d 976 (People v. Statler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York County Court, Erie County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Statler, 31 Misc. 2d 976, 222 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1855 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Burke I. Burke, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction in the Police Justice Court, Village of Alden. Among the errors alleged by appellant is that the officer having custody of the jury during its deliberations was not sworn, as required by the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The allegation calls attention to the identity of said officer who, it appears, was the local Police Chief and who, it further appears, also functioned as the arresting officer. In the return of the police Justice it is shown that in addition, the same officer summoned the prospective jurors.

[977]*977Thus we have the Police Chief in the successive roles of (1) complainant, (2) prosecution witness, (3) constable who gave notice to prospective jurors, and (4) custodian of the trial jury.

While in many circumstances the all-around man is equally if not more valuable than the specialist, viz., halfback Kyle Rote as compared with kicking expert Pat Sommerall of the New York Giants, his different functions in a judicial proceeding are likely to disturb the balance of a fair trial for defendant. Furthermore, section 703 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and section 225 of the Justice Court Act, provide that the names of jurors drawn in a venire must be delivered by the Justice to a constable of the county ‘ ‘ disinterested between the parties ”. The judgment of conviction is reversed and a new trial ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burke I. Burke, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction in the Police Justice Court, Village of Alden. Among the errors alleged by appellant is that the officer having custody of the jury during its deliberations was not sworn, as required by the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The allegation calls attention to the identity of said officer who, it appears, was the local Police Chief and who, it further appears, also functioned as the arresting officer. In the return of the police Justice it is shown that in addition, the same officer summoned the prospective jurors.

[977]*977Thus we have the Police Chief in the successive roles of (1) complainant, (2) prosecution witness, (3) constable who gave notice to prospective jurors, and (4) custodian of the trial jury.

While in many circumstances the all-around man is equally if not more valuable than the specialist, viz., halfback Kyle Rote as compared with kicking expert Pat Sommerall of the New York Giants, his different functions in a judicial proceeding are likely to disturb the balance of a fair trial for defendant. Furthermore, section 703 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, and section 225 of the Justice Court Act, provide that the names of jurors drawn in a venire must be delivered by the Justice to a constable of the county ‘ ‘ disinterested between the parties ”. The judgment of conviction is reversed and a new trial ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 Misc. 2d 976, 222 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-statler-nyeriectyct-1961.