People v. Stathum
This text of 280 A.D.2d 316 (People v. Stathum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Corriere, J.), rendered September 4, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree (two counts), and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 15 years, unanimously affirmed.
A comment made by the prosecutor in summation that defendant attacks as asserting facts not in evidence does not warrant reversal since this comment constituted an effort to draw a reasonable inference from the record and was not prejudicial. Defendant’s remaining challenges to the summation are unpreserved for appellate review and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the challenged comments were generally responsive to the defense summation, within the broad bounds of permissible rhetorical comment, and that they did not deprive defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Overlee, 236 AD2d 133, lv denied 91 NY2d 976; People v D'Alessandro, 184 AD2d 114, 118-119, lv denied 81 NY2d 884). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Mazzarelli, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
280 A.D.2d 316, 719 N.Y.S.2d 862, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-stathum-nyappdiv-2001.